FOURTH QUARTER 2004

EDITORIAL

ADVISORS
Mr. Kenny Koh
Mr. Tony Pang
Mr. Jimmy Tan

EDITORS
Ms. Shermaine Ong
Ms. Ken Koh
Ms. Joey Ng

PR ADVISORS
Foreword Communications

 

IN THIS ISSUE

- SFIC’s Newly Appointed Executive Committee for Year 2004/2006
- SFIC Appoints The International Furniture Design Advisory Panel
- Furniture Design Award 2005: Preliminary Results
- American Hardwood Export Council (AHEC): Supporter of the Furniture Design Award by SFIC
- Robust Sales & Emerging Design Trends at IFFS/AFS 2005
- Life Long Learning to remain relevant: Programmes at the Furniture Learning Institute
- Vietnam – the Next Rising Star of the Asian Furniture Industry?
- An Insight into the German Furniture Industry
- Legal Column: Performance Bond – Stop That Call!
- Understanding Patterns of Sales Performance
- Party Throughout the Viva Vegas Night…


SFIC’s Newly Appointed Executive Committee for Year 2004/2006


Top (L-R): Elsen Ng, Kenny Koh, Simon Ong, Neo Sia Meng, Bert Choong, Choo Yong Fee, Jimmy Tan,
Por Khay Ti, Ann Kang
Front (L-R): Alison Kwok, Jeffrey Yong, Sim Kah Choon, Andrew Ng, James Koh, Jerry Tan,
James Goh, Tony Pang

SFIC members elected in the new Executive Committee for 2004/2006 during the SFIC Annual General Meeting on 24 September 2004. Mr. James Koh of Koda Ltd was unanimously re-elected to the post of President for a second term. He was the President of SFIC from 1991-1994 and 2002-2004.

Under Mr. Koh’s capable leadership over the past two years, the Council made substantial and impactful progress in developing and advancing the six strategic thrusts under the Furniture Industry Capability Upgrading Programme (ICAP). Various initiatives to help companies further extend their global footprints and to champion design excellence as a key driver of national competitiveness took off successfully. In addition, the Furniture Learning Institute (FLI) was launched early this year to provide essential and continuous training to equip industry players with the up-to-date trade know-how and to value-add to their skill sets. More importantly, the Council also successfully garnered the support of various statutory boards and government agencies for Singapore’s proposed international Furniture Trade Centre (IFTC).

Despite the inroads that the Council has already made towards securing Singapore’s growing status as Asia’s regional furniture hub, we must continue to be mindful of the ever increasing competitive landscape and constantly examine ways to sustain our business edge. At SFIC, we are confident that our newly elected Executive Committee will work tirelessly to continue the steady momentum of progress and development for the industry over the next two years.

As Mr. James Koh aptly encapsulated in his thank you speech at the Dinner and Dance, “The world is constantly evolving with new threats and opportunities. SFIC will continue to re-assess its strategies and thrusts, to embrace new initiatives to further the cause of our industry and those of our members. The future looks bright. The exponential growth of the global furniture market has created a dynamic business environment with many challenges. I am confident that SFIC’s forward-looking vision, collective business and industry acumen as well as willingness to take on new challenges will lead to greater rewards for all our members and industry players in the years ahead.”

SFIC Executive Committe for Year 2004/2006

President James Koh
Koda Ltd
   
1st Vice President Andrew Ng
Kiat Lee Industries Pte Ltd
   
Vice Presidents Sim Kah Choon
Abitex Designs (S) Pte Ltd
   
  Jerry Tan
Jaco Singapore Pte Ltd
   
Honorary Secretary Tony Pang
V-Mark Woodcraft (S) Pte Ltd
   
Assistant Honorary Secretary Kenny Koh
Star Furniture Industries Pte Ltd
   
Honorary Treasurer Jimmy Tan
Cellini Design Centre Pte Ltd
   
Assistant Honorary Treasurer Ann Kang
Pan-Star Wood Industries Pte Ltd
   
Executive Committee Members

Alison Kwok
Cathay Decoration & Construction Pte Ltd

Choo Yong Fee
Cheng Meng Furniture Co. Pte Ltd

Jeffrey Yong
Eurosa Furniture Co (Pte) Ltd

Neo Sia Meng
Four Star Industries Pte Ltd

Por Khay Ti
HTL International Holdings Ltd

Simon Ong
Kingsmen Projects Pte Ltd

Elsen Ng
Melandas Home Concept Pte Ltd

Bert Choong
Nobel Design Holding Pte Ltd

James Goh
Supreme Furnishing Centre Pte Ltd

   
Co-Opt Members

Mr Richard Koh
Buylateral Group Pte Ltd

Mr Tony Lin
Eurosa Furniture Co (Pte) Ltd

Mr Neo Chiw Ern
Four Star Industries Pte Ltd

Mr Tan Kwang Kai
Futuristic Image Builder Pte Ltd

Mr Quah Soon Chow
Getz Bros & Co (S) Pte Ltd

Mr Dean Koh
Kiat Lee Industries Pte Ltd

Mr Ernie Koh
Koda Ltd

Mr Steven Chew
Sitra Holdings (International) Pte Ltd

Back to Top


SFIC Appoints The International Furniture Design Advisory Panel

Ten distinguished personalities have been appointed as members of the International Furniture Design Advisory Panel of the SFIC to help catapult the Council’s design initiatives to greater heights.

Chaired by Mr. Simon Ong of Kingsmen Projects Pte Ltd, the Panel comprises of three international and six local persons from the design community, namely:
- Mr. Christophe Pillet, Founder of Agence Christophe PILLET (France)
- Mr. Lars Engman, Chief Designer of IKEA (Sweden)
- Mr. Philip Koomen, Founder of Philip Koomen Furniture (UK)
- Mr. Carsten Ovesen, Managing Director of Carsten Ovesen Design
- Mr. Tan Kwang Kai, Group General Manager of Futuristic Image Builder Ltd
- Mr. Sonny Boey, Managing Director of The Home Merchant Pte Ltd
- Ms Kelley Cheng, Editorial Director of Page One Publishing Pte Ltd
- Mr. Philips Connor, Director (Design) of Space Partnership Pte Ltd
- Mr. Andrew Pang, Product Developer of X-Tra Contract

Back to Top


Furniture Design Award 2005: Preliminary Results

Adhering to the theme “New Asia”, furniture design pieces inspired by everyday items like instant noodles, Japanese slippers and even the traditional Chinese cheongsam are just an interesting sampling of entries received for the Students and Young Designers Categories of the Furniture Design Award (FDA) 2005.

In total, 351 entries were received from the Students and Young Designers Categories this year. This is an increase of 11 per cent compared to participation in these two categories last year. In particular, entries for the Students Category grew by 14 per cent to 278. They were by various institutions such as La Salle SIA, Singapore Polytechnic, Nanyang Polytechnic, Temasek Polytechnic, National University of Singapore (NUS), Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts (NAFA), Raffles LaSalle and Inspiration Design School.

The Young Designers Category, which extended to the Asia Pacific region, also received a 3 per cent increase in entries compared to last year. With some 73 entries coming from countries like Australia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Turkey, one can expect nothing less than an electric mix of cross-cultural inspirations from the competition.

The preliminary judging for the Students and Young Designers categories was held on 11 October and the semi-finals on 29 October. Twelve finalists (seven each from the Students Category and five from the Young Designers Category) had since been selected to produce prototypes to vie for the top spot in the respective categories at the grand finals in March 2005.

The entries were judged based on the following criteria: “Conformity with Theme”, “Creativity & Innovation”, “Form”, “Functions & Ergonomics”, “Material”, “Marketability”, and “Environmental Friendliness”.

The local judges for FDA 2005 were Mr. Peer M. Sathikh, President of Designers Association of Singapore, Ms Rita Soh, President of Singapore Institute of Architects, Mr. Nicholas Merrow Smith, Honorary Secretary of Interior Design Confederation (Singapore), Mr. Carsten Ovesen, Managing Director of Carsten Ovesen Design, Mr. Andrew Pang, Product Developer of X-Tra Contract. The judges from overseas included Mr. Christophe Pillet of Agence Christophe PILLET (France), Mr. Lars Engman, Chief Designer of IKEA (Sweden) and Mr. Philip Koomen of Philip Koomen Furniture (UK).

The Preliminary judging for the FDA 2005 Open Category will be held in January 2005. The closing date for submission of entries for this category is 1 December 2004. Six entries will be short-listed for judging at the grand finals.

Sneak Preview into Some Inspiring Masterpieces of FDA2005

Turn
The Maiden's Hairpin
Vox
Qipao

Back to Top


American Hardwood Export Council (AHEC): Supporter of the Furniture Design Award by SFIC

Leveraging SFIC’s quest to raise design standards regionally and to establish Singapore as a furniture design hub boasting a strong “Asian” brand identity, the American Hardwood Export Council (AHEC) partners SFIC to encourage the use of American hardwoods in Asian furniture designs.


From Left: Mr Peter King (1st Vice Chairman of AHEC), Mr John Chan
(Regional Director of AHEC South East Asia & Greater China), Mr Andrew Ng (1st Vice President of SFIC)
and Mr Tony Lin (President of Eurosa Furniture Co. (Pte) Ltd

AHEC participated in the 2003 and 2004 Furniture Design Award and will again lend its support for the third year in 2005. A further initiative that AHEC conducted to complement the design competition was a seminar on 28 October 2004 for aspiring designers to understand the diversity and working properties of American hardwoods.

As the leading international trade association for hardwood industry in the United States of America (USA), AHEC represents American exporters of hardwood and major hardwood product trade associations. AHEC’s member companies service the growing global demand for American hardwood and hardwood products including sawn lumber, veneer, plywood, flooring, moulding and dimension materials.

In addition, AHEC provides the furniture industry, hardwood trade importers and professional specifiers with promotional assistance, technical and supplier information. AHEC’s programmes are run through the joint efforts of the U.S. hardwood industry and the Foreign Agricultural Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Long term planning and careful forest management by AHEC also ensures that the USA continues to produce reliable, sustained supplies of temperate hardwood.

Over the last two years, AHEC has participated in major trade fairs and exhibitions throughout South East Asia, including Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore. AHEC has also conducted several technical seminars in Singapore as well as engaged in other promotional activities to increase awareness of America’s huge hardwood resource and processing industry.

AHEC is well known for its frequent involvement in design competitions, having previously organized and sponsored similar events in Italy, Spain, Japan and Korea. John Chan, Director of AHEC in Hong Kong, said, “Our continued support of SFIC’s Furniture Design Award is a good demonstration of our long term commitment to the region.”

American hardwoods are now readily available in Southeast Asia. Recent export data for the first half of 2004, issued by the U.S. Government, showed that American hardwoods have recovered lost sales due to SARS and the economic downturn and had made substantial gains in several markets across Southeast Asia. In Southeast Asia, the trade value of the main hardwood species was up 49% compared to the same period last year while others saw even more spectacular growth rates. Tulipwood (yellow poplar) lumber shipments rose from $685,000 to $2.358 million – an increase of 244 per cent.

For white oak, the shipment value to Southeast Asia for the first half of this year stood at $12.5 million. This marks a 57 per cent increase in value for the region. The worldwide increase was 21 per cent.

AHEC’s headquarters is in Washington DC and boasts offices in Europe, Japan, China, Korea and Mexico. Recognizing Asia’s huge market potential, AHEC Southeast Asia & Greater China Office (AHEC-SEA&GRCH) was set up in early 1992 as a regional office.

To better develop business prospects in the Asian market, an inaugural convention of American hardwoods was organized last year in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. This is in addition to the annual convention organized by AHEC in China. For 2004, AHEC held the convention in Qingdao while Beijing will be the venue for 2005’s conference.

AHEC also produces a number of technical publications, which are available free of charge. More information on AHEC can be found on www.ahec-seasia.org.

Contact Details:
American Hardwood Export Council
Room 528, West Wing
20 Salisbury Road
Tsimshatsul,
Hong Kong
Tel: (852) 2724 0228
Fax: (852) 2366 8931

Back to Top


Robust Sales & Emerging Design Trends at International Furniture Fair Singapore 2005/22nd ASEAN Furniture Show

More than 90% of the floor space at the International Furniture Fair Singapore 2005/22nd ASEAN Furniture Show (IFFS/AFS 2005) has already been snapped up.

A whopping 75% of the exhibitors who confirmed their participation for IFFS/AFS 2005 are stalwart supporters. Many of them have increased their exhibition space, like Kenas Pacific from Hong King, DMC International from Ireland, E&M Home Collection and Hong Kong & Shanghai Leather Corporation Limited, both from China; more than doubling their floor space.

Equally important, about 20% of the participation will be making their debut at IFFS/AFS 2005. Debutantes include Tetto Mobilya from Turkey; Encoe Australia from Australia; Musha Cay from Spain; Vader Inc from India; Zanazan and Furniture Classics from USA and many more to be expected.

“We are certainly encouraged by some of the foreign exhibitors participating at the show as they were traditionally more keen on their home-grown flagship trade fairs. Their increased participation at IFFS/AFS 2005 affirms the show’s status as the “Best Show in Asia”. We are also very pleased to note that even the Malaysian participation has tripled from the 2004 show. This is despite the existence of three other furniture shows in Malaysia during the month of March,” said Mr. Jerry Tan, Chairman of the IFFS/AFS 2005 Show Organising Committee, SFIC.

Some other prominent exhibitors to look out for at IFFS/AFS 2005 include Four Hands from USA. Four Hands has been named entrepreneurial growth leader by Inc. Magazine in the USA for three years running. Others include DeCoro from Italy, one of the world’s leading leather upholstered furniture producers and Interwood Vietnam Limited, the largest Vietnamese exhibitor at IFFS/AFS 2005.

Adding to the variety of the show, furniture trade players can also look forward to exhibitors from the British Virgin Islands for the first time. IFFS/AFS 2005 will have exhibitors from 33 countries, establishing the show as a truly international event with the largest number of country participation than any other shows in Asia.

A design-led exhibition, IFFS/AFS 2005 is increasingly recognized by leading furniture design companies as the premier platform to showcase their award-winning innovations. First-time Canadian exhibitor, Product Depot Worldwide Limited, is one such company. It has patented about 300 unique designs and innovative furniture since its establishment in 1989 and won the Best Show Design twice at High Point, USA.

Another design-focused exhibitor to watch our for, among others at the IFFS/AFS 2005, is Design Tray Interior (S) Pte Ltd, whose Systemind® Platform bagged the Silver award at the 2003 International Furniture Fair Tokyo (IFFT). The design, which was patented at IFFT 2003, comprises sleek-fitting modular platform boxes that are designed for multiple uses to provide creative furnishing solutions for small homes and offices and to suit different customer needs.

For 2005, IFFS/AFS is again looking to feature innovative furniture design in Asia with its Design Gallery, which will have twice the number of design-led companies displaying their designer showpieces. In addition, the winners of the 12th Furniture Design Award will showcase their creations at IFFS/AFS 2005, while the ever-popular 3rd Furniture Design Forum will be held on 2 March 2005.

For more information on IFFS/AFS 2005, please visit www.iffs.com.sg.

Back to Top


Life Long Learning to remain relevant: Programmes at the Furniture Learning Institute

It has been ten months since the Furniture Learning Institute (FLI) was launched to help re-skill and train staff so that they remain relevant to the ever changing landscape of the furniture industry. On most accounts, the FLI has been a success in identifying the training needs of the industry and creatively coming up with training solutions to satisfy those needs.

Very early on, the importance of the intra-company communications as well as customer service through interpersonal skills, were identified as key to building up a strong workforce, able to adapt to change and increasingly savvy customers. As Dr Toh Soon Huat of Novena Holdings notes:

Customers are now more discerning of quality and service. There has to be a total upgrade in terms of pricing, quality, design and importantly service. Only then can the company differentiate itself from its peers and give the customer confidence in its products and services.

Dr Toh has been a strong supporter of the FLI programmes, sending over 200 staff faithfully to FLI workshops such as Communications Works! For Staff in the Furniture Industry, Advanced Communications Works! For Supervisors/Managers in the Furniture Industry and Adaptive People Strategies for Sales Effectiveness for Staff in the Furniture Industry.

Other companies such as Star Furniture and the Kingsmen Group have also been sending their staff to such workshops. One not-so-tangible, albeit significant, benefit arising from staff’s participation in such training programmes is the change in mindset after attending the programmes. Many HR managers and directors have observed that before the programmes, the staff’s focus would be on the work and conflicts arising from a clash of working styles and personalities often remain unresolved, thereby creating an unproductive and resentful environment. However, after attending the workshops, the staff learn to be aware of one another’s working styles and communication behaviours. They learn to be more flexible, they communicate better with one another and enjoy better working relationships with their colleagues. Coming together in a non-work environment also gives them a chance to get to know one another better through teambuilding and bonding exercises.

What the managers and directors of companies interviewed appreciated was the FLI’s dialogue with them through follow ups after the training programmes. FLI staff would monitor the progress of a company’s training programme and would initiate discussions as to how to tailor the programmes to suit the company’s needs. Besides the training budget allocated to each corporate member of the SFIC, it is this support and dialogue that differentiates the FLI from other generic training providers. The saying goes “It takes one to know one” and in the FLI’s case, it certainly knows its members’ training needs well.

Interviews

Dr. Toh Soon Huat, Chief Executive Officer, Novena Holdings
Novena is a well-established consumer lifestyle group in the furniture and beauty industry. In Singapore, the group comprises of Novena Investment, Novena Furnishing Centre, Castilla Design, The White Collection, Natural Living, Leewah Essentials, NC Essentials, BSP Global and NIClas International.

Dr. Toh firmly believes in life long learning and puts his money where his mouth is – his company has a training budget of S$150,000 per year excluding the FLI training grant. His view is that:

A company is only as strong as its weakest link. If your top management is strong and enlightened but your support staff is weak, then the company cannot be said to be a strong company. In order to grow, the company and its entire staff must grow together.

That is why he has sent majority of his staff to the FLI’s training programmes. He agrees with what the FLI is trying to do.

The FLI is very supportive, very advanced in terms of training technologies and concepts, and it knows the industry’s problems. It is also creative in designing courses that help fulfil the companies’ training needs.

His advice to other corporate leaders is not to hold back on the training budget as:

The way forward is through the strength of your work force. And this strength comes from learning and applying the skills that you have learnt.

May Koh, Group Retail Manager, Star Furniture
Star Furniture is a furniture and home life-styling retail chain operator in Singapore and Taiwan with its own manufacturing facilities in the region. With a total workforce of 500 staff in Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, China and Japan, its retail chain includes Star Furniture, Mondi Lifestyle and Zen Tradition.

One of the company’s objectives is to develop concepts within its social responsibility scope through continuous learning from experiences learnt and shared within the group. It is this sharing of experiences learnt that motivates Ms Koh to send 55 staff to the FLI’s training programmes. She acknowledges:

The hands-on activities and discussions are helpful, especially since the training provider is able to conduct bilingual discussions. This helps to put some staff at ease since they may not be proficient in the English language.

Like the other managers, she notices that after the workshops:

Staff give positive feedback. They learn a lot from these sessions – both about themselves and about their colleagues. Through games and activities like Johari Window and role plays, staff find out more about how others perceive them and how they can improve their relationships with their colleagues.

Ms Koh feels that communication is one of the most important skills to have in the industry:

Without knowing your customers’ needs, you won’t be able to do a product presentation effectively.

Jeannie Thung, HR Manager, Kingsmen Creatives Ltd
With over 28 years of impressive track record in commercial interiors, exhibition & museums, research & design to integrated marketing communications, Kingsmen has established itself as a leading provider of three-dimensional design and communications solutions across Asia Pacific and the Middle East. Its network of 15 offices across the region is each capable of providing one-stop-shop service, from design consultancy to project management and construction and efficient after-sales services, to clients from any location worldwide.

At Kingsmen, it is believed that the heart of quality lies with the people who are totally absorbed in the notion that quality impacts the market. Everyone has a vital role to play in the chain of activities that produces customer satisfaction. Hence, consistent training and upgrading of its staff allows them to stay relevant to customer needs. After all, the customer’s success is their success.

Ms Thung had the company’s philosophy in mind when she sent 20 staff to a training sessions recently. She said:

Interpersonal communication skills are one of the most valid skills in today’s workforce. When staff “speaks the same language”, and work in synergy, the company becomes more efficient and effective when handling the daily work processes.

Ms Thung notices that after the course:

Staff members gain a valuable insight to their own as well as their colleagues’ unique working style. As such they have become more accommodating and understanding to one another’s needs. Furthermore, with an increased knowledge of using the appropriate communicating style when dealing with external parties, our staff is able to achieve a higher level of customer service excellence.

New Series of Training courses by FLI
Starting this November, FLI will be partnering with Singapore Polytechnic to launch three new training courses on warehouse management, operations and delivery management.

1. Certificate of Performance in Warehouse Management

Topics Covered: Key warehouse processes and activities, principles of good inventory control, housekeeping and security, customer service, material storage and handling, warehouse performance management, audit, design and layout.

Who Should Attend: Warehouse Supervisors

Duration: 16 hours

2. Certificate of Performance in Warehouse Operations

Topics Covered: Key warehouse activities, principles of good inventory control, housekeeping and security, materials handling & storage systems and customer service, basic warehouse management principles.

Who Should Attend: Warehouse Operators

Duration: 16 hours

3. Certificate of Performance in Delivery Operations

Topics Covered: Key distribution activities, delivery scheduling, customer service and handling complaints and safe product handling.

Who Should Attend: Delivery operators

Duration: 12 hours

For enquiry, please contact Ms Joyce Lee @ 6568 3251 or joyce@singaporefurniture.com.

Back to Top


Vietnam – the Next Rising Star of the Asian Furniture Industry?

Vietnam, with a landmass of about the size of New Mexico in USA, boasts a population of about 82 million. 63% of its 38-million-strong workforce is involved in agriculture trade while the rest works in other sectors.

Increasingly, the agriculture-based nation is diversifying in other areas of growth and the wood furniture trade is one non-farming sector that is yielding impressive results and is fast becoming Vietnam’s next golden goose.

In 2003, Vietnam’s total woodwork furniture export was worth US$560 million – almost a 30% increase from 2002. For 2004, the total woodwork furniture export is expected to rise to US$1 billion, almost a 50% increase compared to 2003 export estimates. (All figures based on statistics by the Vietnam Ministry of Trade)

Today, the United States is the third largest importer of Vietnamese furniture, right behind Japan. Vietnam’s woodwork furniture export to the United States leaped seven-fold over the past three years. Its value surged from just US$13 million in 2001 to US$93.4 million in 2003. The European Union is currently Vietnam’s leading furniture importer. While foreign-managed manufacturers currently account for the majority of Vietnam’s wood furniture exports to the United States, increasing demand is expected to come from native US furniture companies.

  Top 3 Import Countries for Vietnamese Furniture 2003 Imports (US$)
1
European Union (EU) 163.3 million
2
Japan 110.9 million
3
United States 93.4 million

3 main areas of furniture production:

1. Hanoi – It is the manufacturing centre for home accents and solid wood traditional Vietnamese furniture with exports primarily to Asia. Hanoi is considerably more industrialized than other parts of the country and looks set to become an important player in the furniture export market.

2. Danang – This region is slated for a round of clustered industrial development by the Vietnamese government, of which initiatives to further develop the furniture industry may be included.

3. Ho Chi Minh City – This is the current centre for furniture manufacturing with key exports to the USA market. A combination of home-grown Vietnamese and foreign-managed plants can be found located mostly in clusters in the city as well as the adjacent Binh Duong, Dong Nai and Long An provinces.

Vietnam’s Competitive Edge

1. Cheap Labour Cost
With a current minimum wage of approximately US$35 per month, Vietnam has one of the lowest industrial wage structures in the world. The low labour cost has attracted more manufacturers to relocate their factory operations from countries like Malaysia, Philippines and even China to Vietnam in recent years.

2. Established Infrastructure
Existing well-established furniture manufacturing infrastructures provide good supply-chain support essential for industrial growth. The nine ports and harbours on the Gulf of Tonkin and the South China Sea provide manufacturers ready and easy access to international shipping lines. The US-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement, which took effect in 2001, will significantly increase Vietnam furniture exports to the USA. Currently, the USA is assisting Vietnam in the implementation of legal and structural reforms required in the agreement.

3. A Strong Alternative to China
Despite China’s strong growth in the recent years, Vietnam, with its low labour costs, quality craftsmanship and highly adaptable work force proves to be a strong competitor to China.

Disadvantages for Vietnam

1. The Moisture Issue
Most of the lumber found in the Southeast Asian region – specifically in countries like Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam – are below 15 per cent equilibrium moisture content (EMC). Without appropriate equipment and procedures to treat and dry the wood, some of the problems that may arise in the furniture products include splitting, warping, twisting and even loosening of joints and veneers.

2. Cultural Differences
Compared to workers in China, Vietnamese workers adopt a more laid-back attitude and would be less receptive to overtime work requirements. In addition, they are also known to react poorly to criticism or reprimands and resent being subjected to close work supervision.

3. Communication Difficulties
The inability of many native Vietnamese workers to understand English translates to production lines issues as the communication of production goals and quality standards is hindered.

To overcome these challenges, the Vietnamese government has embarked on several initiatives to boost its competitive edge in the global furniture industry. For example, to address the issue of Vietnam’s inadequate ports and ill-developed transportation routes, the government has developed a transportation infrastructure development master plan that aims to double Ho Chi Minh City’s port capacity by 2010. Part of this strategic blueprint includes the development of a sophisticated network of modern roads in the city to speed up transportation of containers from factories to the dock.

To upgrade the skill sets of workers in the furniture industry, the Handicraft and Wood Industry Association (HAWA) in Ho Chi Minh City is planning to launch a technical school for its members. Workers will be trained in furniture production, product finishing and design. HAWA also plans to partner companies like Akzo Nobel and Valspar to provide finishing expertise and training at this school.

With such developmental strategies in place, the Vietnam furniture industry is definitely poised to take on strong regional competition in the coming years.

Some Foreign-owned furniture factories at a glance

Factory Green River Koda Latitude Tree Woodworth
Ownership Taiwanese-owned, part of Green River Group Singaporean-owned Malaysian-owned Taiwanese-owned
Established 2001 2000 2002 2003
Product Categories Bedroom, dining, curios and occasional Bedroom, dining, occasional and upholstery Bedroom, dining, occasional and wall units Bedroom and chairs
Workers 2,100 450 1,100 1,500
Current Shipment 285 t0 300 containers per month 250 containers per month 150 to 200 containers per month 40 to 50 containers per month
Product Facilities in Vietnam 1.1 million sqft plant 21,000 sqft plant in Vietnam was built in 2000; 120,000 sqft Koda International plant was built in 2002 600,000 sqft plant 500,000 sqft plant in production

Back to Top


An Insight into the German Furniture Industry

Though one of the most attractive furniture markets in the European Union, Germany is also one of the hardest hit by the prolonged sluggishness of the economy over the last two years.

Nevertheless, Germany is still one of the largest furniture consumers in the European Union, boasting about Euro 313 per capita consumption of home furniture. However, in the recent years, German furniture manufacturers have experienced a steady decrease in consumer spending on furniture. One of the reasons for this trend is the aggressive proliferation of Ikea-like furniture concept stores, which offer consumers a large variety of furniture and home furnishings at very competitive prices. Stores such as Porta, Ostermann and Lutz, which boast floor space between 4,000 to 10,000 square meters now make up about 25 per cent of the German furniture market share.

The growing market segment for lower-end furniture outlets has attracted traditional, high-end retailers such as Zurbruggen, Finke and Segmuller to infiltrate the “budget and mid-range” market in a bid to capture a share of the business pie. Currently, the trendsetters in German furniture trade include Rolf Benz, Cassina and De Sede (upholstered furniture), Marktex (high-end furniture), Hulsta (middle to high-end furniture), Bulthaup, Siematic and Zeyko (kitchen furniture) and Paidi (children furniture).

Total Germany Residential Furniture Imports
Germany is one of Europe’s major furniture importers, with an average 5% growth in residential furniture imports between 1997 and 2002. Germany imported more than Euro 6,157.4 million of residential furniture, a breakdown by products of which is as follows:

Most of the residential furniture imports originate primarily from Eastern Europe, accounting for 45.3% share of the total in 2002. This comprised mainly of transfers of furniture, which were manufactured by subsidiaries of German companies in these regions where the labour cost is lower. The major partner is Poland, with a share of 21.2% worth Euro 1,306 million in 2002. Almost half of the imports from Poland are upholstered furniture.

Furniture imports from the Asia Pacific accounted for about 7.2% of Germany’s total furniture imports. A large part of it was from China. Imports from China increased by an average of 29% since 1997 and accounted for 3.2% of the German market share in 2002.

Germany Residential furniture sales by distribution channel, 2002. Percentage breakdown of value data

Furniture Distribution Channels
Germany’s distribution system is characterized by its high degree of concentration in certain locations.

About 85 per cent of furniture sales are made through specialist distribution channels, which include small independent retailers, buying groups and furniture chains. One of the most significant developments of the distribution system in recent years is the increasing influence and concentration of buying groups, which control and distribute up to an estimate of 70% of German furniture. The increasing business pressure asserted by these groups is making it increasingly difficult for independent outlets to resist leveraging the groups’ distribution channels.

Distribution by product segments

Product Segments Distributors
Upholstered furniture

70% - distributed through large scale specialist chains, including franchising and buying groups

15% - through non-specialised distribution channels including mail order, e-commerce and DIY stores

15% - through small independent specialist retailers, including generalists and upholstery specialists

Upper end furniture

60% - controlled by independent retailers

25% - through buying groups such as WK, Musterring, Garant

10% - through franchising

Rest - through the contract channel

Kitchen furniture

Kitchen furniture distribution is dominated by furniture chairs and buying groups, followed by specialists and DIY stores. These collectively have a great influence on the market for kitchen furniture. They control 50% of total sales.

Majority of retailers are part of these groups.

Top 10 Leading Furniture Distributors in Germany (2002)

Company
Furniture Sales
% of furniture on total sales
Type of distribution
Group
 
Million EUR
Market share %
     
Begros
2,380
9.2
70
Specialized: L/BG
spc
VME
2,299
8.9
87
Specialized: L/BG
spc
Garant Mobel Germany
1,674
6.5
93
Specialized: L/BG
Garant Mobel
Atlas Germany
1,645
6.4
70
Specialized: L/BG
spc
Union
1,636
6.4
55
Specialized: L/BG
ATLAS
Ikea Deutschland
1,498
5.8
70
Specialized: L/CI
spc
Mondial
1,349
5.2
93
Specialized: L/BG
spc
MHK
1,316
5.1
70
Specialized: L/BGK
MHK+WK
Europa Mobel
1,268
4.9
98
Specialized: L/BG
spc
DMV Deutscher
980
3.8
70
Specialized: L/BG
DMV

Imm Cologne Furniture Show

The Imm Cologne Furniture Show held at Cologne fairgrounds is a must for many manufacturers, dealers, designers and visitors worldwide. The 2004 event was participated by 1,368 suppliers from 48 countries and over 120,000 visitors.

Come 17-23 January 2005, the global furniture and interior-decoration sector will once again congregate in Cologne, where new ideas are showcased, trends are launched and the course is set for future business success.

Another key highlight for 2005 is the Imm Cuisinale, which is held once every two years and showcases the international suppliers of kitchen furniture and fitted appliance.

The SFIC will once again be leading a Singapore pavilion to participate in this fair. Do drop by our booth at Hall 7.1 Stand No. A2/B3 for a hot cup of coffee whilst in Cologne then.

Back to Top


Legal Column: Performance Bond – Stop That Call!

In our second installment of this series, we examined issues related to suspension of work. Today, we will discuss those relating to performance bond.

Many trade contractors assume that the performance bond is required by the terms and conditions of the Standard Form Building Contract (“the contract”) published by the Singapore Institute of Architects (the “SIA”). It may surprise many that the contract is silent on performance bond. It is not a requirement of the SIA. In most cases, the Owner’s consultant inserts the clause on performance bond into the Letter of Award over and above the terms of the Standard Form Clause. Contractors can negotiate to remove this additional term on performance bond prior to entering the contract.

In recent years, many construction companies increasingly find that their insurers are unable or unwilling to issue performance bonds. As a result, some owners agreed to do away with performance bonds. Presumably, these owners were satisfied that their interests were sufficiently protected by the retention sum provisions set out in the contract.

For contractors who have completed servicing their performance bonds, it would be worthwhile to understand how Owners or Main Contractors can be prevented from issuing further performance bonds.

Very often, when a trade contractor receives news about performance bonds from the insurer, it came as an unexpected and unfair surprise. The trade contractor will have to retrieve and examine relevant past documents to collate the necessary information for presentation in Court.

In an application for Court injunction, the Trade Contractor has to show that it was fraudulent or unconscionable for the Owners (or Main Contractor) to call on their respective performance bond. Consequently, this requires a high degree of documentary proof. The trade contractor is also bound by duty to provide full and frank disclosure, notwithstanding the merit of the application.

Two cases may illustrate the complexity of performance bond issues. In the first case, a letter from the owner’s project consultants advocated one method of rectifying a defect, which would have been relatively inexpensive. Instead, the owner engaged another set of consultants to replace the defective works at a much higher cost and called on the performance bond hoping to recover the higher cost incurred. In the second case, the delay certificate was issued by a third party instead of the project architects. This resulted in the delay certificate being defective and the owner was not entitled to any liquidated damages or to call on the performance bond to recover them.

In both cases, the trade contractor’s lawyers must proceed with haste to avoid the insurers from paying out the respective performance bonds before it is determined that the Owner has no right to claim the settlements. This is especially so when the Court could not stop the call. Unlike usual court proceedings where the Court would schedule a hearing date 3 or 4 weeks later after receiving the hearing application, the lawyer had to go to the Court to see the duty Registrar and thereafter the duty Judge before a date is set.

The Court appointment can be made within 24 hours of the application for both cases. The necessary injunctions can also be issued if the Court were to agree with the lawyers interpretation of the related documents. In both cases, the Court injunctions were served on the insurers successfully and the call on the performance bonds was stopped in time. These two cases demonstrated how critical it was to obtain the relevant documents quickly and on time.

It is strongly recommended that the construction industry review the need for performance bonds. If performance bonds were needed at the commencement of the construction period to secure the Contractors’ performance, one would have thought that the bond value should be reduced and eventually discharged as the retention sums accumulate progressively. It would be considered unfair to require the trade contractor to provide the double protection of both the performance bond and the retention sums throughout the construction period. This would also create added cost to the whole industry. Afortiori (all the more so) if the consultants under-certified the value of work.

In the aforementioned 2 cases, the Court could see that the projects were completed, TOP of CSC issued and yet the owners were withholding large portions of the contract sums due to under certifications. In such circumstances, it may be easier to conclude that the owners’ call on the Performance Bond was unconscionable.

Back to Top


Understanding Patterns of Sales Performance

Individual sales performance varies from staff and may be the direct result of the respective person’s work attitudes and sales ethics. The key to achieving great sales returns for any organization lies in the nurturing of “best sales practices” among sales staff through continuous education and most importantly, having a management that leads by example.

Observed Mr. Andrew Sng, Senior Partner (Asia) of Decision Processes International (DPI), “Sales is the life-blood of any business! Regardless of the job title or whether or not one has face to face contact with customers, every employee is more or less a salesperson in the company as the person represents the company. Unfortunately in Singapore, it is not a priority for a company’s management to cultivate a good corporate sales culture.”

Common attributes if top performing salespeople:
- Possess the ability to relate to a diverse range of customers, i.e. people of all ages, nationality, race and gender
- Posses a personable disposition (e.g. remembering customers’ names, etc) and are trusted by customers
- Possess excellent product knowledge
- Possess a good listening ear and are empathetic towards customers’ problems
- Places customer issues priority
- Efficient in solving customers’ problems at hand
- Proactive
- Organised and punctual
- Take pride and enjoy their work
- Meticulous in their work, making few or no mistakes, including follow-up sales services
- Possess a loyal customer base
- Creative in improving sales performance and to achieve sales targets
- Warm and friendly towards customers, including browsing ones

Attributes frequently associated with ineffective salespeople include:
- Possess a cold and unapproachable disposition
- More interested in making the sale than meeting the customers’ needs
- Inability to relate the product offerings to customers’ needs
- Are poor in handling customer rejections
- Not proactive
- Use uncreative and impersonal sales tactics, e.g. forgets customers’ names or requirements
- Does not conduct follow-ups with customers
- Fail to capture customers’ loyalty and possess small customer base
- Often late for work
- Inefficient, makes errors resulting in customer complaints
- Fail to meet sales targets

Unfortunately, most ineffective salespersons fail to make the correlation that the quality of customer service has a direct impact on the sales outcome. They often attribute failures and poor sales results to external factors without examining their own work ethics.

Mr. Sng added, “The most common mistake a salesperson makes is in identifying the wrong customer. A high proportion of buying in organizations today involves a team or a Decision Making Unit rather than an individual. Hence you need to focus your sales pitch towards the group rather than the person.”

He also observed that sales people nowadays give in too easily to their customers, often offering freebies and promotions to unresponsive customers even before they indicate any interest in purchasing the product.

Manage at Individual Staff Level for Best Sales Results
One of the greatest challenges for today’s sales managers lies in their ability to inculcate ‘best sales practices’ among their staff. This is particularly so in seasoned sales people who are resistant to change. Behavioural changes can be more effectively brought about through individual counseling sessions with the sales team through regular coaching by the management.

“It’s the old adage of ‘Monkey see, monkey do’ and this means that the management must lead good sales practices by example,” said Mr. Sng.

He also advises on the importance of strategic sales reports that can be leveraged as a value-added tool to improve work performance. “Get each salesperson to identify a prospective customer “hit list” and quantify the potential sales that each of these customers can bring to the company… this way, management can also add value to the sales process by helping each staff develop a more targeted sales pitch to each customer.”

He also cautions against the following to avoid high turnover of sales staff in an organization:

- Unrealistic sales targets
- Rewards does not commensurate with sales efforts
- Low-quality product
- Lack of proper sales training for staff
- Lack of clear career progression for staff to aspire to

Back to Top


Party Throughout the Viva Vegas Night…

For the first time in SFIC’s history, more than 1,000 members and business associates turned up for the Council’s 23rd annual Dinner & Dance held on 24 September 2004 at the Suntec Convention Centre. A pre-dinner cocktail session allowed guests to catch up with friends and network with business partners as they exchanged the latest gossips and news on the industry. Guests came dressed in their best and to the theme, “Glamour & Glitter”. Three casino gambling tables, complete with adorable “bunny ladies”, were set up for guests to try their luck at blackjack and roulette.

Lucky individuals won attractive prizes, courtesy of the sponsors of the Dinner and Dance. Not forgetting the less fortunate among us, SFIC collaborated for the first time, with TOUCH Community Services (TCS), a non-profit voluntary welfare organization, to raise funds for the needy. Generous donations from dinner guests through the sales of bingo cards, wines and a mini-auction, made the fund-raising event a success. A total of S$10,807.00 was raised that night. It was definitely a fun-filled night of entertaining performance, games and feasting!

Mr James Koh (SFIC President) with Mr James Goh (Executive Director of Supreme Furnishing Centre). Special thanks to Mr Goh for his generous bid for the painting by TCS clients - Sim Kim Han and Sim Siong Lin.

SFIC would like to take this opportunity to thank all the following sponsors for their strong support and contribution:

A’biance Pte Ltd
Ambrosia Communications Pte Ltd
Asia Premium Marketing
Blum South East Asia Pte Ltd
Cellini Design Center Pte Ltd
Cityneon Exhibition Services Pte Ltd
Commercial & Residential Interiors Pte Ltd
DGM Solutions Pte Ltd
Foreword Communications
Grand Copthorne WaterFront Hotel
JIM Logistics Management Pte Ltd
Media Planning Services
MediaRing Pte Ltd
NC Woodwork & Construction Pte Ltd
Novena Furnishing Centre Pte Ltd
Orient-Explorer (S) Pte Ltd
Permanent Personnel Services Pte Ltd
Pico Art International Pte Ltd
R T Sofa
Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd
Shanghai Tong Lee Hardware Pte Ltd
Singapore Exhibition Services Pte Ltd
Singapore Furniture Association
Singex Venues Pte Ltd
Star Furniture Industries Pte Ltd
Studio 2000 Pte Ltd
Sunrise Doors International Pte Ltd
Suntec Singapore
The Oriental Singapore
Trans-Link Exhibition Forwarding Pte Ltd
UOB Bank
Weng Heng Pte Ltd

Back to Top


DISCLAIMER
Whilst every care is taken to ensure accuracy of the information on this newsletter, SFIC accepts no liability for damages caused by misinterpretation of information, expressed or implied, within this newsletter. No part of this newsletter may be reproduced in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing from SFIC.

 

Home | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
Copyright © Singapore Furniture Industries Council 2005 | Powered by Xirlynx Innovations